You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Evidence’ tag.
Further to her decision in Lee Sau Fat v FH Security Services Co Ltd (unrep., DCEC 1720/2006, 120/2007, DCPI 1471/2008, [2009] HKEC 1085) (discussed in [2009] 8 CJRA), Madam Judge Marlene Ng again expressed her dismay in the present case, in respect of what she perceived as the parties’ attempt to usurp the court’s discretion to determine how expert medical evidence should be obtained and presented. In this case, she felt that the parties had sought to force the court’s hands by presenting the court with solo expert medical reports, obtained without prior leave of the court. In her concluding remarks, Madam Judge Marlene Ng commented that she hoped that the changes brought into effect by the Civil Justice Reform would improve the way parties litigated their claims going forward.
CJR Alerter: For full analysis of this case subscribe to the Sweet & Maxwell CJR Alerter, produced in association with Clifford Chance.
This article is available in [2009] 10 CJRA.
In this short video Martin Rogers Head of Litigation and Dispute Resolution in Asia for Clifford Chance, and General Editor of The Hong Kong White Book discusses the changes to evidence and trial procedure following the implementation of Civil Justice Reform in Hong Kong (2 April 2009).
在這影片中，Clifford Chance 的合夥人暨香港及亞洲區訴訟及調解糾紛主管、Sweet & Maxwell出版之《香港民事訴訟程序》總編輯Martin Rogers，將講述於2009年4月2日實行之香港民事司法改革之相關事項，包括討論證據及審訊程序。
在这影片中，Clifford Chance 的合夥人暨香港及亚洲区诉讼及调解纠纷主管丶Sweet & Maxwell出版之《香港民事诉讼程序》总编辑Martin Rogers，将讲述於2009年4月2日实行之香港民事司法改革之相关事项，包括讨论证据及审讯程序。
